Einstein’s Trick—Now I Know It! (2004)

Good Morning, Good Morning

What kind of knowledge do you have about Einstein? Is he, to you, the scientist who designed the atomic bomb, or the genius who proposed the theory that would one day become the basis for a time machine?

We often judge his greatness not only from the atomic bomb or time machines, but also from topics such as black holes and the Big Bang. Today, many people would name Einstein as the very symbol of genius. Yet, if someone asked you to explain the theories he published, you would probably answer, “I don’t really understand them.” Strangely enough, most people acknowledge Einstein as a genius despite not knowing his theories at all.

This clearly shows our tendency to trust information without examining it carefully. When enormous sums of tax money are spent to build gigantic facilities, or when something appears in academic textbooks, we simply assume the theory has been proven. In reality, the theories Einstein published have not been fully verified even today, and none of their fundamental contradictions have been resolved. Ordinary people are never informed of this fact—they merely provide the funding.

Every explanatory book published so far rephrases the mathematical contradictions as “paradoxes” and treats them as features of the theory. If someone truly understood Einstein’s theory, they should be able to explain the mathematical causes of these many paradoxes. But doing so would prove that his theory is flawed. And that would overturn the massive projects and verification experiments of modern physics from the ground up.

Where contradictions exist, there must be an underlying error. Yet, for reasons convenient to scholars, this “highly suspicious theory” has been left unexamined. The purpose of this book is to show that anyone can verify it easily—without expensive equipment—using nothing more than paper and a pencil.

Years ago, while working on an unsolved mathematical problem, I discovered that a single mental calculation could create a powerful mathematical trick. Because I had incorporated mental arithmetic into the development of the theory, it merely appeared as though the unsolved problem had been solved. It was nothing more than a misunderstanding, and completely useless.

Some time later, I encountered a book praising a strange theory that used exactly the same trick—celebrating it as a great revolution in physics. That theory was none other than Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity,” said to be the foundation of modern physics and the key to unlocking the mysteries of space-time.

The greatest problem with this theory is that it begins by forcing us to accept two mutually contradictory principles. To turn mathematically inconsistent conditions into equations, everyone performs mental adjustments before writing the formulas. The unrecorded calculations then become the core of the theory, and the entire framework evolves into a historic mathematical trick.

In educational settings, questioning relativity is considered taboo, so students are made to study a fictional theory. They only begin to raise doubts when they finally admit to themselves that they had merely been pretending to understand it.


For about seventeen years, I urged physicists to reexamine relativity, but it seems the task was a bit too heavy for Japanese physicists. With no other choice, I decided to make public both the trick Einstein created and the hints needed to uncover it.

I hope that the points raised in this book will prevent readers from being misled by a fictional theory. And if it allows you to enjoy the feeling of having a century’s worth of scales fall from your eyes, then I will consider my goal accomplished.


Table of Contents
  • 1. Relativity Is 100% Wrong
  • [A DAY IN THE LIFE]
    • 1. 1. Encounter with a Genius
    • 1. 2. Solving Relativity Through Fermat’s Last Theorem
    • 1. 3. Look at the Initial Conditions
    • 1. 4. Hunting for Contradictions Is a Waste of Time
    • 1. 5. Focusing the Discussion on Mathematics
    • 1. 6. Think with Your Own Head
    • 1. 7. Omissions Lead to Oversights
    • 1. 8. What “Answers” Mean in Physics
    • 1. 9. Resetting the Mathematics
    • 1.10. The True Nature of Relativity
    • 1.11. Anyone Can Verify It
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.1: The Twin Paradox?
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.2: Does GPS Use Relativity?
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.3: Were Particle Accelerators Designed Using Relativity?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 2. Genius-Level Ideas Give Birth to Tricks
  • [SEXY SADIE]
    • 2. 1. Becoming a Genius Because I Was a Dropout
    • 2. 2. “Match the Units”
    • 2. 3. Mathematics as a Universal Remedy
    • 2. 4. Patterns in Problem Solving
    • 2. 5. Einstein’s Magic
    • 2. 6. Traveling with Light
    • 2. 7. Galileo Would Be Crying
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.4: Does Light Bend Due to Spacetime Curvature?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 3. The Mathematical Formulation of the Principle Has Failed
  • [ACROSS THE UNIVERSE]
    • 3. 1. Mathematical Formulation as a Filter
    • 3. 2. Mathematical Expression Ends with “c”
    • 3. 3. Take Back the Theory of Relativity
    • 3. 4. An Interpretation Expanded Too Far
    • 3. 5. The Curse of Velocity
    • 3. 6. Where Galileo’s Theory Was Misunderstood
    • 3. 7. c Is Wrong
    • 3. 8. Variables That Become Constants
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.5: A Speed That Appears Constant to Everyone?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 4. Maxwell’s Silver Hammer
  • [MAXWELL'S SILVER HAMMER]
    • 4. 1. What Is a Function?
    • 4. 2. An Unknown Function That Isn’t Really Unknown
    • 4. 3. Possibilities Within Limits
    • 4. 4. A Function That Does Nothing Can Fool the World
    • 4. 5. The Omitted Function
    • 4. 6. See Through the Omitted Function
    • 4. 7. Can You Determine the World’s Exchange Rate from Your Wallet?
    • 4. 8. Do the Laws of Motion Change with a Ratio of Speeds?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 5. Even Pythagoras Would Weep
  • [HEY BULLDOG]
    • 5. 1. The Distorted Pythagorean Theorem
    • 5. 2. Deriving the Equations of Relativity
    • 5. 3. Transformation Ratio = 1
    • 5. 4. Drew the Diagram?
    • 5. 5. Borrowed Simultaneity
    • 5. 6. The Reset Diagram
    • 5. 7. The Composite Diagram
    • 5. 8. Origin of the UniverseT
    • 5. 9. Correction Work = Relativity
    • 5.10. The Geometric Meaning of Relativity
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.6: Why Does a Theory of Optical Illusions Become an Equation of Motion?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 6. The Secret of the Paper
  • [GLASS ONION]
    • 6. 1. Non‑Constant Yet Invariant Light Speed
    • 6. 2. The Denial of Simultaneity
    • 6. 3. Fixed Separation
    • 6. 4. Simultaneity Takes Priority
    • 6. 5. Do We Even Need the Function τ?
    • 6. 6. The Unnecessary Function
    • 6. 7. A Resting Frame That Isn’t Moving
    • 6. 8. The Role of t
    • 6. 9. The Disappearing Function τ
    • 6.10. The Astonishing Coefficient β
    • 6.11. Even the Coefficient β Disappears
    • 6.12. The Mystery of the Jump Is Solved
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.7: Solving Problems with Differentiation?
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.8: Only the Direction of Motion Contracts?
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.9: Was It Proven by a Solar Eclipse?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 7. E = mc²: The Non‑Existent Formula That Changed History
  • [YOU NEVER GIVE ME A MONEY]
    • 7. 1. What the Paper Actually Says
    • 7. 2. A Circular Proof
    • 7. 3. E = mc² Is a Theoretical Formula
    • 7. 4. Defined Equivalence
    • 7. 5. Don’t Be Trapped by Unit Systems
    • 7. 6. The K‑Frame Exists Only for the Trick
    • 7. 7. The Role of Object B
    • 7. 8. c² Is Unnecessary
    • 7. 9. The Decrease in Energy
    • 7.10. If Converted Fairly…
    • 7.11. Conservation of Momentum?
    • 7.12. v/c Is Just a Ratio
    • 7.13. Is Momentum
    • 7.14. Where Did the X‑Component Go?
    • 7.15. What Does “Divide by v” Mean
    • 7.16. Common Ground with Relativity
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.10: Neutrinos?
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.11: Crushed by a Black Hole?
    [Translation Pending]
  • 8. Re‑Examining the Michelson–Morley Experiment
  • [LUCY IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS]
    • 8. 1. Overview of the Experiment
    • 8. 2. Classical Physics Rejected
    • 8. 3. Verification Misled by Equations
    • 8. 4. Reintroducing Classical Physics
    • 8. 5. Summarizing the Overlooked Points
    • [Translation Pending]
    • Column.12: Is the Speed of Light c Even at the Moment of Emission?
    [Translation Pending]
  • Birthday